SUIRG logoSUIRG's Uplink...Downlink, News on Satellite Interference
Fourth Quarter 2007 Issue

Letter from the President

Our industry has been consumed this year with the issue of sharing portions of the C-band frequencies with International Mobile Telecommunications (IMT), including WiMax. As the only member association exclusively focused on the problem of satellite interference, SUIRG took the lead in field testing WiMax systems operating within the area of a Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) system which occurred in October this year.

Our field test results identified unequivocally that WiMax and FSS transmissions could not co-exist without severe interference to the C-band signal. These findings lent weight and substance to the "No Change" campaign waged by a coalition of FSS advocates at the ITC World Radiocommunication Conference (WRC) meeting in Geneva. SUIRG's test results ultimately supported - and we hope influenced - the ITU's final decision not to allow sharing of the frequencies, which will ensure uninterrupted, interference-free use of C-band for the future.

In summary, the ITU's decision is viewed as no change to the C band allocation overall. The decision allowed for some minor modifications limited to the 3.4-3.6 GHz band, primarily aimed at accommodating the requirement of some countries that were interested in deploying (or had already deployed) terrestrial Wireless systems in the extended C-band.

The feature story in this issue of our newsletter highlights the satellite and WiMax C-band compatibility testing and its results. Thank you to everyone who supported the WiMax testing effort, especially the U.S. Navy, SES NEWSKIES, SES Americom, General Dynamics Satellite Division, and RSI/Vertex.

C-band Interference Field Test Report

C-band frequency sharing between satellite and terrestrial wireless has been a hotly contested topic of late. SUIRG members and the satellite industry as a whole have been very vocal on the need to reserve the precious C-band spectrum for satellite communications. The controversy prompted SUIRG, in conjunction with the Global VSAT Forum (GVF), the U.S. Navy and several other satellite organizations, to perform a live field test in the United States in late October.

The Field Test

The Field TestA coordinated effort was undertaken to confirm whether WiMax systems would cause severe interference to satellite systems operating in the 3.4-4.2 GHz-frequency band. The test was conducted in two phases in RF quiet areas to ensure no external signals contaminated the test results:

Phase 1: A Prodelin-provided Fixed Satellite Service (FSS) antenna, Vertex/RSI-provided LNA and a WiMax unit were moved to several locations with various angles and distances up to 1 km from the FSS antenna. The testing simulated a subscriber unit operating within the vicinity of an FSS antenna system.

Phase 2: In this case, the WiMax base antenna was fixed at a height of 50 m on a water tower, while the FSS antenna was positioned at several locations at various angles and significantly greater distances from the WiMax antenna than in Phase 1. The purpose of Phase 2 was to provide field data as to the distance required to meet the maximum long-term WiMax-generated I/N (interference/noise) of -10 dB specified for an exclusion zone where WiMax systems could not be installed.

The NSS 806 satellite, located at 319.5°E, was used for both phases of the test with the baseline video signal sent from a TT&C (Telemetry, Tracking & Control) earth station in Manassas, Virginia. The FSS antenna was aligned to receive a video program channel at 3,515 MHz.

Phase 1 was conducted in Punta Gorda, Florida where the FSS antenna stayed at a fixed location while the WiMax transmitter, at a slightly elevated level of about 3 m, was moved to a variety of locations. The FSS receive video signal C/N (carrier/noise) was set to a nominal 10 dB. At the receiver down-converter (D/C) output, the bit error rate (BER) and digital power of the carrier were measured to establish a baseline.

The WiMax transmitter and omni-directional antenna were fixed to a vehicle and set to transmit at various frequencies and power outputs. Field testers adjusted the WiMax transmitter to various frequencies and various output power levels. C/N, I/N, BER, and video-quality results were then measured at the FSS antenna along with spectrum plots for each phase of the test.

Article continues »

This issue of SUIRG's Uplink...Downlink newsletter is made possible by generous sponsorship from:

Learn more here »

In This Issue

Your Feedback

We want to hear from you. Please email the editor with member updates, article suggestions or feedback on this newsletter.

 

Archives

Find past issues of SUIRG's Uplink Downlink here.

For more information, call 1-941-575-1277 or visit www.suirg.org



Subscribe to Uplink...Downlink here, or click here to unsubscribe.

© 2007 Satellite Users Interference Reduction Group